Mercurial > public > mercurial-scm > hg
comparison mercurial/hg.py @ 32172:448ed4d3ee90
outgoing: run on filtered repo
outgoing has been using an unfiltered repo since fe67107094fd (discovery:
outgoing pass unfiltered repo to findcommonincoming (issue3776),
2013-01-28). If I'm reading code and history correctly, it should be
safe to run _outgoing() on a filtered repo since c5456b64eb07
(discovery: run discovery on filtered repository, 2015-01-07). By
running _outgoing() on a filtered repo, we can also remove the
workaround there for ignoring filtered revisions.
| author | Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 05 May 2017 10:08:36 -0700 |
| parents | 9ff5a124d111 |
| children | 71e735bd8170 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 32171:fb9b6bfb54b5 | 32172:448ed4d3ee90 |
|---|---|
| 867 revs, checkout = addbranchrevs(repo, repo, branches, opts.get('rev')) | 867 revs, checkout = addbranchrevs(repo, repo, branches, opts.get('rev')) |
| 868 if revs: | 868 if revs: |
| 869 revs = [repo.lookup(rev) for rev in scmutil.revrange(repo, revs)] | 869 revs = [repo.lookup(rev) for rev in scmutil.revrange(repo, revs)] |
| 870 | 870 |
| 871 other = peer(repo, opts, dest) | 871 other = peer(repo, opts, dest) |
| 872 outgoing = discovery.findcommonoutgoing(repo.unfiltered(), other, revs, | 872 outgoing = discovery.findcommonoutgoing(repo, other, revs, |
| 873 force=opts.get('force')) | 873 force=opts.get('force')) |
| 874 o = outgoing.missing | 874 o = outgoing.missing |
| 875 if not o: | 875 if not o: |
| 876 scmutil.nochangesfound(repo.ui, repo, outgoing.excluded) | 876 scmutil.nochangesfound(repo.ui, repo, outgoing.excluded) |
| 877 return o, other | 877 return o, other |