commit: if interactive, look elsewhere for whitespace settings (BC) Previously, when doing `commit -i`, we respected `diff.ignorews` and other whitespace-related settings, which is probably unexpected. The primary reason for this is to support hgext.record's commandline options, it's probably accidental that the `[diff]` settings were also considered. See comments on issue6042 and D5490. This can cause problems (issue5839, issue6042). It is assumed by the author that the `[diff]` section is primarily for *viewing* diffs, and that it is unlikely what people intend when attempting to commit or revert. With this change, if a user wants the behavior, they can clone their `[diff]` settings to `commands.commit.interactive.<setting>`. This is thus a mild BC change, but one I suspect is not going to be relied on by anyone. Note: while doing a partial commit/revert, we do not know what command the user is actually running. This means that the split extension, which ends up calling into this code, will respect the `commands.commit.interactive.<setting>` settings, and not a hypothetical `commands.split.interactive.<setting>`. This *also* means that setting `commands.commit.interactive.ignoreblanklines`, for example, will still cause issue5839. Considering the highly unlikely chance that a user actually sets `commands.commit.interactive.<setting>`, the author deems this risk acceptable. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5834

--- a/tests/test-split.t	Thu Jan 31 14:29:24 2019 -0800
+++ b/tests/test-split.t	Thu Jan 31 14:47:34 2019 -0800
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
   > [diff]
   > git=1
   > unified=0
+  > [commands]
+  > commit.interactive.unified=0
   > [alias]
   > glog=log -G -T '{rev}:{node|short} {desc} {bookmarks}\n'
   > EOF
@@ -105,10 +107,10 @@
 
 This function splits a bit strangely primarily to avoid changing the behavior of
 the test after a bug was fixed with how split/commit --interactive handled
-`diff.unified=0`: when there were no context lines, it kept only the last diff
-hunk. When running split, this meant that runsplit was always recording three commits,
-one for each diff hunk, in reverse order (the base commit was the last diff hunk
-in the file).
+`commands.commit.interactive.unified=0`: when there were no context lines,
+it kept only the last diff hunk. When running split, this meant that runsplit
+was always recording three commits, one for each diff hunk, in reverse order
+(the base commit was the last diff hunk in the file).
   $ runsplit() {
   > cat > $TESTTMP/messages <<EOF
   > split 1